A buyer map from real-world problem shapes to QPC run families. One polycontextural stack. Domain encodings. Published reports with IBM and vendor job IDs. Circuit synthesis stays with QPC.
Evaluation and diligence Same stack · many domains Core IP protected
One repeatable polycontextural pattern you operationalise across tasks: co-resident logics, one quantum job, rankings on raw counts.
Per domain you change: node semantics, coupling rules, context labels, and how metrics are explained. Public diligence uses published reports and auditable job IDs. Hands-on evaluation uses the bounded showcase JSON.
Procurement and integration proceed on published evidence. Circuit construction stays inside QPC.
Each row maps a problem shape to a published QPC report. Current IBM Heron r2 desks sit first.
| Domain | Problem shape | QPC run family | Public report | Typical inputs → outputs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semiconductor lithography | Six photomasks, six competing mask logics, one ranking | Mask synthesis desk · 24 measured contextures · ibm_kingston | Mask synthesis | ICCAD-2013 panel → coupled ranking on raw counts (no-OPC 0.622, ILT 0.460) · job daas1burrl7c73860bd0 |
| Pharma / ADMET | Seventeen ADMET logics on one frozen lead panel | ADMET Lead Desk · junction RYY · ibm_marrakesh | ADMET desk · Pharma Atlas | Frozen table → raw junction gap 0.185 · retention 0.749 · separable 0.184 |
| Energy · pharma · credit · EO | Multi-goal industry decisions: reliability/carbon/cost; efficacy/safety/population; profit/risk/fairness; cloud/priority/energy | Real-world desks · one IBM job per desk | Real-World Desks | Open panels (eGRID, OpenFDA, German Credit, NASA POWER) → coupled rankings + public job IDs |
| Organizing / NVIDIA | Three logics in one job vs a three-job hybrid path | Organizing comparison · CUDA-Q on Kingston | Desk 03 · CUDA-Q | Same grid task → 3 jobs become 1 · 31 merge steps become 0 · job d9tp5ic98n5s7391u4m0 |
| Architecture proof (IBM) | Coupled job vs separable and intracontext controls | ICC · Joint Structure Challenge · MCGS · PFQM | Architecture · JSC · MCGS · PFQM | Coupled vs control arms → raw ICC gaps, pre-registered pass criteria, job IDs |
| ESG / mobility / insurance (Heron) | Multi-objective industry tasks; parallel contextures in one IBM submission | Polycontextural industry pilots | Heron trilogy · Cerrado · Traffic · Allstate | Domain instance → decoder headline + auditable IBM job IDs |
| Finance / systemic risk | Network of institutions; cascade and phase-transition readout | Multi-context stress on graph | Crash report | Graph / weights → stress indices, ranked nodes, phase-style readouts |
| Portfolio / insurance | Many assets, constraints, multi-objective framing | Multi-context portfolio encoding · Classiq comparison | QPC vs Classiq · Harel summary · Allstate pilot | Asset set + rules → coupled score and ranking (Classiq: QPC 7.587 vs Classiq-cut 9.072) |
| HPC / cyber resilience | Infrastructure nodes, tiers, lateral movement and storage contexts | QPC-HTD-20Q (Garnet class) | IQM HTD page · IBM + Aquila | Fixed node map → θ, P(H≥θ), R, top dangerous nodes, JSON + job ID |
| Climate / policy (CO₂) | Multi-regime, multi-stakeholder constraints | Parallel / multi-contexture CO₂ architecture runs | CO₂ results | Scenario tags + architecture params → comparative quantum metrics across context counts |
| Supply chain / aerospace | Discrete choices, couplings, capacity-style constraints, multi-OEM programs | Structured operational graph on IBM Heron | Supply chain · Aerospace pilot | Chain encoding → sampled configurations, scored objectives, IBM job IDs |
| Geopolitical / crisis scenarios | Scenario lists, ranked outcomes after the quantum pass | Data-driven scenario quantum ranking | Crisis final report | Scenario payloads → ordered results, executive report linkage |
| Strategy / multi-option | Discrete strategic options; synergies and conflicts as edges | Same family as supply / portfolio: decision qubits + interaction Hamiltonian | Design Partner | Option set + pairwise couplings → high-coherence combinations and indices |
| Relational structure in → out | Graph → circuit → decode to relation | RICT encode–decode | RICT report | Graph spec → measurements → reconstructed structure (F1-style metrics in report) |
| Platform compatibility | Same portable job shape on vendor cloud | Hardware smoke and full-width checks | Pasqal, Origin, Azure, IQM | QPC operator runs on vendor backends → JSON metrics, job IDs, uniqueness and depth stats |
For partner evaluation, open the Design Partner page. Circuit synthesis stays with QPC under NDA.
The catalog maps domains to published evidence. For a run with your own parameter choices, use the showcase: 3 contextures, 8 parameters, one IBM Heron job.
Optimization showcase
Configure 3 contextures and 8 parameters, download JSON, email QPC, receive one IBM Heron job ID and a result summary.