July 2026 · Same task · Different systems

Quantum Polycontextural Computing

Same cyber desk task on IBM Heron and QuEra Aquila

One shared score matrix (9 enterprise assets × 17 cyber desks). QPC runs it as a native job on each machine: digital on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits), analog AHS on Aquila. Public job IDs on both systems. The layer travels.

What QPC delivers: Same task. Hardware-native encodings. Coupled vs separable architecture discriminator. Rankings from the quantum readout.
IBM Heron r2 · ibm_fez

Cyber Command Desk · 156Q

Job
d9eephkjeosc73fimti0
Geometry
9 assets × 17 desks + junctions · SamplerV2
Bridge signal
2.1× the matched control
Top assets
Payments · API gateway · LLM agent
IBM ranking · public job ID
QuEra Aquila · Amazon Braket AHS

Same cyber desk · 153 atoms

Coupled task
…/da791b26-cdc5-4f0d-a55d-7e5849eabbc9
Separable task
…/fffedbb9-626d-472d-9b04-103f1db2657a
Encoding
Local detuning ← scores · geometric bridges
|Δ ZZ_bridge|
0.039 ≥ 0.02 (architecture PASS)
Top assets
OT plant · Payments · LLM agent (2/3 name overlap with IBM)
Architecture PASS · dual-publish ready

Also on Aquila. Full register, 256 atoms

Universality benchmark: four contextures on the full Aquila FOV, coupled vs separable, same global drive. A full-size portability witness.

Coupled
…/3e23aa99-fe42-49be-88ea-196d88487d07
Separable
…/c1292879-d8b9-4146-ab6e-b5b9ab622316
|Δ ZZ_bridge|
0.283 · PASS on 256 atoms